On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:31:59 -0400, David Gileadi <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 6/10/14, 3:57 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree all the way with std.experimental as the package name. Though
I might throw in an alternative argument to stdx and instead promote
unsafe.* or std.unsafe. ;-)
The only issue I see with *.unsafe.* is that it sounds related to
@safety. So far I haven't seen a better name than std.experimental.
If it weren't a keyword, volatile would be a very good package name for
this.
-Steve
