On 6/10/14, 3:57 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree all the way with std.experimental as the package name. Though I might throw in an alternative argument to stdx and instead promote unsafe.* or std.unsafe. ;-)
The only issue I see with *.unsafe.* is that it sounds related to @safety. So far I haven't seen a better name than std.experimental.
