On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 05:02:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/16/2016 3:17 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Long story short, it si clearly a waste of time. Qualifying
the process would be
Some specifically DIP27 has been written in Feb 2913,
discussion at that time. I pushed it at the time. I moved it
to the new git DIP
repository. Got mostly irrelevant feedback (Hi Martin) and
more generaly the
loop time is measured in month.
The wiki DIP27 is here:
listed as a draft, last change Sep 2014. I don't see it in the
new DIP repository:
either submitted, approved, or in a PR.