On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 05:02:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/16/2016 3:17 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Long story short, it si clearly a waste of time. Qualifying the process would be
an understatement.

Some specifically DIP27 has been written in Feb 2913, following various discussion at that time. I pushed it at the time. I moved it to the new git DIP repository. Got mostly irrelevant feedback (Hi Martin) and more generaly the
loop time is measured in month.

The wiki DIP27 is here:


listed as a draft, last change Sep 2014. I don't see it in the new DIP repository:


either submitted, approved, or in a PR.


Reply via email to