|
Last time I tried my hands on the SavageFB
(DirectFB 0.9.14) I found that the SavageFB driver is WAAAY slower than VESA FB.
Especially if you're using any alpha/transparency. The system I tried it on was
a 1.2Ghz Celeron with VIA Twister (which is a Savage4 or something) running the
latest 2.4.x at the time.
I don't care much for the feature of changing
resolutions on the fly, so VESA FB works fine, but I still find it odd that it
would be faster than the "native" driver.
Any clues/ideas? Anyone with similar
experience?
/Henric
|
- [directfb-dev] Re: XDirectFB in ARGB Marcus Gustafsson
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VESA FB Henric Andersson
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VESA FB Sven Neumann
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VESA FB andi
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VESA FB Henric Andersson
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VESA FB Denis Oliver Kropp
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VE... Henric Andersson
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB v... andi
- [directfb-dev] Re: Savage... Henric Andersson
- [directfb-dev] Re: Savage... Denis Oliver Kropp
- [directfb-dev] Re: Savage... Henric Andersson
- [directfb-dev] Re: SavageFB vs VESA FB andi
