It seems a lot of people thing about domain names market like
about cucumbers or tomatoes market and that they are on the
street. :)
Well if there is enough clients for $10 the price will stay $10.
If you don't like it just make your purchase somewhere else
it is so easy. Most of you haven't spend an hour to change
the templates so it will not be a big loss for you :))))
This is the way that market could be regulated. But to post
one and the same message here is non sense.
And please if you want to talk about the prices send your posts
directly to OpenSRS, I really don't know why do you thing you
will have your problem resolved if you post here?
Regards,
Doytchin, tired to read one and the same....
WebWiz wrote:
> Ashish wrote:
> >> May i add a correction here, supplier take less profit, so that i
> >> can survive.
>
> But is it the supplier's responsibility to ensure that your business
> survives? Isn't that your responsibility? To make sure that you are
> sourcing your goods for resale at a price that allows you to make sufficient
> profit to survive (and preferably grow)?
>
> >> ...survive. Yes, sure it is for OpenSRS to decide, no arguement
> >> about that. And how about we requesting OpenSRS to consider his
> >> prices, is that too wrong ?
>
> Not at all. What I object to is people CONSTANTLY posting messages pointing
> to news articles or other "market indicators" (term used loosely)
> *DEMANDING* that OpenSRS reduce their prices. As for requesting...that's
> been done to death. I'm fairly certain that OpenSRS knows you'd like the
> prices to drop.
>
> Regards,
> Eric Longman
> Atl-Connect Internet Services
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
> | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net |
> | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 |
> | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WebWiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Bruce P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows stance on secondary market speculation
>
> May i add a correction here, supplier take less profit, so that i can
> survive. Yes, sure it is for OpenSRS to decide, no arguement about that. And
> how about we requesting OpenSRS to consider his prices, is that too wrong ?
> C'mon friend, this debate has stretched uncomfortably longer with people
> against price hike still offer any new agrument except barking again and
> again go else somewhere, quality of service etc. Although there was one very
> credible argument regarding opensrs being based in usa and canada.
>
> Ashish
