My email filters must not be working, so I've decided to respond to
4 of your more riduculous comments all at once:


> I did take into account ICANN accreditation fees. RSPs could sponsor the
> $5000 accreditation fees, so assuming they have 100 RSPs, each would pay
> yearly $50.
> 
> RSPs could sponsor the development costs together, the open srs server
> development, and also the client development.

You already are sponsoring ICANN accrediation fees and development costs 
with OpenSRS ... you think the $4 markup is all profit?

Unless you are suggesting all RSPs under your registrar pay an equal share
of the ICANN/developement costs, regardless of how many domains they 
register?  Good luck convincing the Mom-and-Pop RSPs that they should pay
the same as the bigger RSPs (oops, there I go again, telling people how
to run their business).


> I agree with you that at Asian (Indian, Singaporean, Malaysian,
> Philippines,etc) prices and services, U.S. corporations like Tucows can
> be easily put out of business.

Tucows/OpenSRS is Canadian.


> Open SRS is a non-for-profit effort, thus their revenue should be
> minimum if any.

Are you high?  OpenSRS is *not* not-for-profit.

And even it were, "not-for-profit" does not mean "can't-make-money".


> Tucows is earning millions through their infamous "for-profit"
> Domain Direct. And, yes I know alot about their running costs.

Yeah ... damn those capitalist bastards!

Look, if you want to go start your own open registry , I encourage you to
do so.  But if you can't research your facts and insist on making false
statements, your credibility is just going to continue going down hill.

- Colin

Reply via email to