Adam Beecher wrote:
>
> I've been lurking on this issue for a while, because I was pretty much
> undecided myself, and wanted to see what other people thought. In all
> honesty, I filled in the survey on the OpenSRS website last week, and I don't
> think I objected to the offering of secondary services at the time. On
> reflection, and having read the (majority of) postings against the matter, I
> think I have to concur. I think that it may hurt the RSP's and/or OpenSRS in
> the long run, and quite probably both. It was Scott's post that put the nail
> in the coffn though, and made most sense (although some others made a lot of
> sense too) - it might work, but I think there's a bigger chance of it
> screwing it up for everyone. Is there anything to be said for postponing any
> further on-the-ground developments of these services until such time as it
> has been researched more carefully?
I too did not object at the time but now wish I could go back and change
my answers to that survey. :-(
Lance Woodson
