> It's statements like yours that many of the ICANN types have used in
> support of their control of "OUR" internet and all those have been proven
> wrong and I invite you to join the domain policy list at the ORSC and find
> out for yourself http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/domain-policy/
I'll take a look later this evening.
> > They don't and can't stop you from using alternative root servers. The
fact
> > that there really aren't any feasable options is because of the
> > compatibility problems that would occur, not goverentment regulation,
IMO.
>
> Warren - completely wrong - this has everything to do with government
> attempts to gain control of the internet and nothing to do with
> "compatibility problems". I'd be interested to know if you could identify
> these problems because i'll be damned if I know of any.
A) You create .god ... It's all fine and dandy, works great for some, most
can't see it.
B) ICANN creates .god ... Everybody else sees something different then you.
Who wins?
Compatibility was the wrong word, I was talking about administrative
control, not technical compatibility.
