Swerve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > BUT, if the WIPO lawyers force a sunrise scenario, then the trademark > holders of Love and Sex, and probably any single word you can think of, may > scoop them before your automated scripting engine tries to pound the entry > points. > In my opinion the people who operate the automated scripting engines are far, far worse than trademark holders... Trademarks are an imperfect solution, and always have been, but there is some good points to them. Domain aggregators are scum, however, and deserve nothing less than LARTing. adam
- .web, .nom, .shop, ... Florian Effenberger
- RE: .web, .nom, .shop, ... James Woods
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... William X. Walsh
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, .... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: .web, .nom, ... J. Scott Schiller
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... adam
- Re: .web, .nom... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, ... adam
- Re[2]: .web, .... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]:... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... adam
- Re: .web, .nom... Swerve
- Re[2]: .we... Florian Effenberger
