Marc Schneiders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I can see that you have thought about this very long, since you > present your reasons for the measures you suggest in such a balanced > way. > There's nothing good to be said about domain aggregators. Nothing. They're in the same class as spammers. adam
- .web, .nom, .shop, ... Florian Effenberger
- RE: .web, .nom, .shop, ... James Woods
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... William X. Walsh
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, .... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: .web, .nom, ... J. Scott Schiller
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... adam
- Re: .web, .nom... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, ... adam
- Re[2]: .web, .... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]:... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... adam
- Re: .web, .nom... Swerve
- Re[2]: .we... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom... Marc Schneiders
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .sho... William X. Walsh
