Hello dnsadmin, Sunday, December 10, 2000, 11:44:27 AM, you wrote: > Just a note. ICANN is required to listen to the majority, is it not? In > this case, can't we round up all RSP's and have a large voice if we present > our views to ICANN? ICANN won't even create a constituency for individual domain name holders. And ICANN couldn't make such a change as you are proposing without the approval of the US Dept. of Commerce. -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's dnsadmin
- Re: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's William X. Walsh
- Re: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's Joe Baptista
- Re[2]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS R... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by O... Joe Baptista
- RE: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by O... dnsadmin
- Re[4]: ICANN political movement by ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[4]: ICANN political move... easygoing
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN political ... WebWiz
- Re[6]: ICANN political move... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN political ... Joe Baptista
- RE: Re[6]: ICANN political ... easygoing
