Hello easygoing, Sunday, December 10, 2000, 9:04:11 PM, you wrote: > Only difference is that NSI would lose the registration fees and charge back > fees while OpenSRS loses nothing from the process as OpenSRS was paid by the > RSP, not the end user. And the NSI-Registry would not lose the fee paid it by the NSI Registrar. > So as usual, you are trying to compare apples and oranges while claiming to > be offering bananas. No, not at all. If NSI-Registrar can't take possession and auction off unpaid domains, why should you be able to? -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's dnsadmin
- Re: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's William X. Walsh
- Re: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's Joe Baptista
- Re[2]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS R... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by O... Joe Baptista
- RE: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by O... dnsadmin
- Re[4]: ICANN political movement by ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[4]: ICANN political move... easygoing
- Re: Re[4]: ICANN political ... WebWiz
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN political ... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN political ... Joe Baptista
- RE: Re[6]: ICANN political ... easygoing
- Re[8]: ICANN political move... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: ICANN political ... Dave Warren
- Re[8]: ICANN political move... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN political movement by O... Dave Warren
- RE: Re[2]: ICANN political movement... Charles Daminato
- Re: Re[2]: ICANN political move... Dave Warren
- RE: Re[2]: ICANN political ... dnsadmin
- Re: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's Swerve
