Not really.
NSI the registrar takes the $6 out of one pocket and puts in the other one
(belonging to NSI the registry). In effect, NSI is losing nothing from the
process, although a few bucks got shuffled around on the balance sheet.
Regards,
Eric Longman
Atl-Connect Internet Services
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net |
| 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 |
| Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
----- Original Message -----
From: "easygoing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 12:04 AM
Subject: RE: Re[4]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's
Only difference is that NSI would lose the registration fees and charge back
fees while OpenSRS loses nothing from the process as OpenSRS was paid by the
RSP, not the end user.
So as usual, you are trying to compare apples and oranges while claiming to
be offering bananas.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William X. Walsh
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 10:55 PM
To: dnsadmin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[4]: ICANN political movement by OpenSRS RSP's
Hello dnsadmin,
Sunday, December 10, 2000, 4:42:03 PM, you wrote:
>> If NSI cannot reclaim unpaid domains for auction, RSPs should not be
>> permitted to take ownership of domains either. This is a wise policy.
>> I support it remaining as is.
> If someone buys a domain from NSI, and 1 month later does the charge
back --
> do they still have full access to the domain, or does NSI place it on
Hold?
> What is the process if someone does a chargeback at NSI for a domain they
> bought 1 month prior?
They lose use of the domain, just like they would with OpenSRS.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
