RE: Re[3]: Domain Disputes - TUCOWS is now acting as judge and jury!!!

[Ross Wm. Rader]

Before the revolution, let's try some evolution first. We're convinced that
ICANN will adopt consensus policy. Let's give it a shot first with our
privacy initiative and see what happens. If we can't get any traction at
all, then we'll storm the gates ;)

In all seriousness, we should be able to work within the system to get
changes like this done. Call me idealistic, but I see no evidence of anyone
having tried to any large degree. Time, patience and effort are what we need
now...

-rwr

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William X. Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:51 PM
> To: Ross Wm. Rader
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[3]: Domain Disputes - TUCOWS is now acting as judge and
> jury!!!
>
>
> Hello Ross,
>
> Tuesday, March 13, 2001, 2:25:47 PM, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>
>
> >> I still don't like the vagueness of the ICANN rules, though...
>
> > It's not that the rules are vague, it's just that they're
> "thick". Most of
> > the clauses are referential in nature which means that anyone
> that wants to
> > figure which ways is up has to read two, three and sometimes four other
> > documents or clauses just to get the proper context...
>
> Hence why it should be completely tossed, and the registrars should
> lead the way with ICANN to get it fixed/tossed.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  William                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>