I agree totally.
But the question that was asked and responded to in this
message was if he was doing wrong as a hosting company to
verify that the client had requested the changes of hosts.
Which is my opinion is no, as the two things are not
comparable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Kai Schaetzl
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Network Solutions Change of
> Registrar Authorization Request
>
>
> > I don't see a problem with a hosting company emailing a
> > client to ensure that the client is aware of the
> > transaction,
> >
>
> I think in the case discussed here this is quite
> different. Not only
> that NSI is not a hosting company, when you
> transfer a domain there's
> already one confirmation request coming from
> OpenSRS. Why should both
> registrars need such a confirmation? As I
> understand OpenSRS would be
> taken for liability if the confirmation on their
> side isn't valid. I
> would also imagine this is pretty standardized by
> ICANN probably. So,
> there's no second confirmation necessary and
> especially not only one
> year after the transfer system started. We all
> know that many clients
> tend to overlook email or just don't get it at
> all or too late. And
> they sureley even less understand why they now
> have to confirm twice
> with a tine gap of a week between the two
> requests and to two
> different parties.
>
> The aim of this second email by NSI is clearly to
> hinder the transfer
> process, they are building up an additional
> barrier to transfers.
>
> Kai
>
> --
>
> Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
