I understand your position regarding automated deletions, and I do not expect to see OpenSRS offer them.
My point is that your decision is based on factors other than customer demand (such as perceived potential for abuse, and perhaps the pain of implementing yet another feature). Some of your competitiors have chosen to make this feature available to their customers in spite of all the obstacles. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Rivers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OpenSRS Discuss List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Grace period domains deletion > Hello, > > In the example you gave, simply change the domain contact info to the > person or company who complained about the infringement. Problem Solved. > > There is no need for automating the deletion process and the potential > for abuse is extreme. > -- > > Robert Rivers > OpenSRS Technical Operations > http://www.opensrs.org/Support_FAQ.shtml > > Chuck Hatcher wrote: > > > > "Let it expire" may seem to be an adequate (and easy) solution from your > > perspective, but it ignores the fact that some of your customers want the > > feature (a feature that is available from your competitors). Each time you > > are unresponsive to the needs of your customers, you lose a little. > > > > There are lots of good reasons a registrant may want to cut a domain name > > loose immediately (such as discovering it infringes the trademark of a > > litigious company). Granted, they can change the contact details to > > something completely bogus, but that is technically not allowed (and may not > > be sufficient). > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "Robert L Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "OpenSRS Discuss List" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:24 AM > > Subject: Re: Re[6]: Grace period domains deletion > > > > > Well, there are several cases of domains being hijacked, bounced around > > > registrars, deleted at a registrar that allows deletions, recreated > > > immediately so it appears that the new owner is legitimate. If a user > > > doesn't want a domain, let it expire. > > > > > > I'm still working on a better deletion policy - it's been a busy week with > > > the .biz launch. More to come. > > > > > > Charles Daminato > > > TUCOWS Product Manager > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Dave Warren wrote: > > > > > > > > We're actually currently looking into modifying our policy. The > > intent is > > > > > to prevent abuse, and not have a hardline stance against deletions. > > Your > > > > > mileage may vary. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe 1 in 100 domains? 1 in 250? We'll have to work something out > > (and > > > > of > > > > > course, there's always exceptions...) > > > > > > > > What is the potential for abuse? Other then systems load on OpenSRS... > > > > > > > > Perhaps as a solution, 1 free deletion per 100 domains, beyond that, the > > RSP > > > > will still pay a fee. That fee will be n% of $10, where N is the number > > of > > > > domains deleted in the current block of 250 actual registrations? > > > > > > > > Naaa, too much administration. > > > > > > > > How about 1% of your registrations can be deleted, beyond that, there is > > a > > > > $1 deletion charge, if a refund is granted? > > > > > > > > Lastly, how about deletions beyond the 5 day period, where no refund > > would > > > > take place? Could a transfer-like challenge system confirm that the > > > > deletion request is valid, and allow users to delete domains? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The nice thing about standards, there is enough for everyone to have > > their own. > > > > > > > > > > > >
