We're assuming, of course, that SnapNames numbers are accurate to any
degree.  Yes, we allow the occasional deletion (we're not monsters over
here) but we do ask you to ensure that when a domain is submitted, that
it's correct and paid for.  Sometimes mistakes happen, sometimes we delete
domains.

Even then, if this number IS accurate (let's just suppose) then it
accounts for less than .25% of our total registrations (give or take) and
is quite a low number (hrm...)

Still, I think the methodology used by snapnames (because they don't have
access to registry data, and are extrapolating in some manner or another)
is incorrect.

Charles Daminato
TUCOWS Product Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Joel Moss wrote:

> He's got a point there!  Can anyone at Tucows explain that one?
>
> Joel Moss
> Online Networks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===========================
> http://homepagenames.com
> http://homepagetools.com
> ===========================
> tel/fax: (44) 1257 794911
> icq: 69715613
>
>
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: ����������
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:26 PM
>   Subject: Re: Grace period domains deletion
>
>
>   what i don't get is why if it is true snapnames reported
>
>   > TUCOWS/OpenSRS 7,576
>
>   with the second most domain deletions of all registrars when resellers are NOT 
>allowed to delete domains?
>
>   am i missing something?
>
>   i really hate calling customers who mispelled their name or accidently registered 
>the domain years for 10 instead of 1(usually happens cause of accidently rolling the 
>rolling thingie on mouse's) and tell them they can't cancel their domain because 
>TUCOWs does not allow it. most ICANN accredited registars allow deletions which 
>pisses many customers off arguing why we can't do it for them but some other site X 
>can. but i really didn't give it much thought thinking TUCOWs was not allowing 
>deletions... but from the snapnames report it would seem TUCOWS was actually deleting 
>*MUCH* MORE domains then other registrars, while telling most(?) resellers that 
>deletions were not allowed
>
>   someone plz explain?
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     ���� ���: JoelMoss
>     �޴� ���: �ڿ뱸
>     ���� ��¥: 2001�� 11�� 5�� ������ ���� 8:34
>     ����: Re: Grace period domains deletion
>
>
> I maybe presuming here, but if Tucows is supposed to offer deletions within the 5 
>day grace period to registrants, then surely that
>
> feature must then be extended to its resellers (us)!  I seem to remember something 
>being mentioned about this a while back, but from
>
> what I see, nothing became of it.
>
>
>
> I would like to officially request that resellers be allowed to send as many 
>deletion requests as we need to Tucows within the 5 day
>
> grace period, as trhis is effectively what ICANN say they must allow, yet TUCOWS 
>only allows us one deletion - ever!!
>
>
>
> Joel Moss
>
> Online Networks
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ===========================
>
> http://homepagenames.com
>
> http://homepagetools.com
>
> ===========================
>
> tel/fax: (44) 1257 794911
>
> icq: 69715613
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Sergei Kolodka"
>
> To:
>
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:28 PM
>
> Subject: Grace period domains deletion
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello discuss-list,
>
> >
>
> > Cite from "Editorial Update: State of the Domain,
>
> > Third Quarter 2001" by SnapNames:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > The following lists the number of names in this group
>
> > that had been registered and canceled within the five
>
> > day grace period at the most affected registrars:
>
> >
>
> > VeriSign Registrar 12,340
>
> > TUCOWS/OpenSRS 7,576
>
> > Register.com 2,322
>
> > DotRegistrar 731
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Am i missed something and domain deletions within
>
> > grace period now part of OpenSRS API ?
>
> > Or SnapNames wrong in digits ?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Best regards,
>
> > Sergei Kolodka
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to