Isn't that something... I'll keep my mouth shut until I get the words in a
proper format...

Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
(812) 275-8425 - Office
(815) 364-1278 - Fax

----- Original Message -----
From: "George Kirikos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: maxi.org -- an example of the "new" deletion procedure


> I guess it's evident that all the OpenSRS dropping names are now going
> to be skimmed for the quality names.
>
> Check out the WHOIS for maxi.org (someone in a chat room mentioned this
> one):
>
> Registrant:
>  PTI
>  W.R.P.O.  Box 75149
>  White Rock, BC V4B 5L3
>  CA
>
>  Domain Name: MAXI.ORG
>
>  Administrative Contact:
>     Schilling, Frank  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     W.R.P.O.  Box 75149
>     White Rock, BC V4B 5L3
>     CA
>     604-536-1811
>
>  Technical Contact:
>     Schilling, Frank  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     W.R.P.O.  Box 75149
>     White Rock, BC V4B 5L3
>     CA
>     604-536-1811
>
>  Billing Contact:
>     Schilling, Frank  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     W.R.P.O.  Box 75149
>     White Rock, BC V4B 5L3
>     CA
>     604-536-1811
>
>
>  Record last updated on 19-Dec-2001.
>  Record expires on 01-Nov-2002.
>  Record Created on 01-Nov-2000.
>
>  Domain servers in listed order:
>     NS2.DIRECTSEEK.COM   216.187.118.219
>     NS1.DIRECTSEEK.COM   216.187.118.218
>
> In particular, note that it never dropped (it was expired, but directly
> transferred to the new registrant).
>
> This is going to set a *bad* precedent. What if NSI starts doing this?
> This opens up a can of worms due to short-sightedness. Grrrrr. :(
>
> What's worse is that OpenSRS/Tucows advocated a quite different
> position in the discussion a few months ago. See:
>
> http://www.byte.org/rc-deletes/
>
> And I quote:
>
> "It is the recommendation of this document that Verisign Global
> Registry Services (VGRS) immediately:
>
> 1. Eliminate the "batch pool" methodology and infrastructure currently
> in place as an "interim" measure.
> 2. Reinstate the previous "first-come, first-served" re-registration
> processes.
> 3. Require that all registrars immediately cease "batch-delete"
> processes.
> 4. Require that all registrars adhere to the 45-day post-expiry
> registered name deletion requirements of the Verisign
> Registrar/Registry agreements.
> 5. Police denial of service and other abusive practices by registrars
> as required by the Verisign/ICANN registry services agreement."
>
> Allowing certain parties to cherry-pick the best names is hardly
> consistent with the above.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
> or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

Reply via email to