>Does anyone actually *like* the idea of getting access to 'dropped names', >assuming the whole channel had the access. Ross asked the question, I'd >like >to see it answered.
You don't explain what you mean by "access". SnapBack-like service is OK, Hijacking domains is not. I have talked customers into paying a higher fee because Tucows does not do this sort of thing. Some of these customers have hundreds or thousands of domains;. I would "like" it if I got the name I wanted for sure. However, I would still not go along with it because it violates the ICANN agreements and the whole industry would start to do it. I do not agree with Mr. Allen when he says it does not violate the ICANN agreement. While the agreements can be interpreted in a number of ways the issue is that ICANN does not enforce the agreement. Just because ICANN doesn't enforce it doesn't mean it doesn't violate the agreement.
