Scott, This is really very simple - openSRS do not OWN these names. So you cannot SELL them.
I have always respected openSRS for the way you try to approach things from an ethical standpoint. But now you appear to have jumped right into the mud pit in order to compete with the NSI's of this world. I really hope you don't go forward with this 'service' ... Lee Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:53 AM Subject: Re: maxi.org -- an example of the "new" deletion procedure > At 02:18 PM 12/20/01 -0800, George Kirikos wrote: > > >One thing I neglected to point out is that this is *not* the secondary > >market, this is the PRIMARY market. The secondary market consists of > >sales where the names are transferred from one registrant to another. > >The only way one can argue that this is a product for the "secondary" > >market is if one takes the position that OpenSRS and other 'registrars' > >(as opposed to the registry) have equal rights to that of the prior > >registrant once a name expires, and is under no obligation to delete > >the name. Instead, the registrar (now also a registrant) can satisfy > >this "secondary market" using whatever process it desires, via a > >transfer, just as any normal registrant can. > > Expired names are often referred to as "the secondary" market - I think I > have seen this most frequently on SnapNames' materials and reports. Anyhey, > don't infer anything else from my characterization than me "parroting" a > (perhaps poorly construed) term. > > sA > > > Scott Allan > Director OpenSRS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
