My two cents on this one... I believe the only reason we have to pay for domains on expiry is because Verisign has that 'autorenew' feature on a domains expiry.....some other registries don't work that way....I think it's more a comprimise that was made when fitting the rules from the Single Registrar model into the new reality of multiple registrars...and not something we can infer 'ownership' from.
Thanks, Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Brody > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:14 PM > To: Don Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line > > > then we disagree. > > michael > > At 11:57 AM 1/2/2002 -0600, Don Brown wrote: > >At 12:49 PM 1/2/02 -0500, Michael Brody wrote: > > > >>If the registrar has put up the money to hold the domain then > don't they > >>have some form of rights to the domain? The registrar is in > fact holding > >>the domains because they have put up their money to hold the names. > >> > >>michael > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >No. > > > > > >---- > >Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net > >PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049 > >Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate > >---- > >
