Thanks, Ken. After reading the section about "autorenew" in the contract at http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/info/registry-agmt-appc-i-26apr01.htm there is no doubt that it is a mechanism of convenience for V$ and the Registrars, rather than the tender of any type of ownership rights to the Registrar.
At 01:15 PM 1/2/02 -0500, Ken Joy wrote: >My two cents on this one... > >I believe the only reason we have to pay for domains on expiry is because >Verisign has that 'autorenew' feature on a domains expiry.....some other >registries don't work that way....I think it's more a comprimise that was >made when fitting the rules from the Single Registrar model into the new >reality of multiple registrars...and not something we can infer 'ownership' >from. > >Thanks, > >Ken > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Brody > > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:14 PM > > To: Don Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line > > > > > > then we disagree. > > > > michael > > > > At 11:57 AM 1/2/2002 -0600, Don Brown wrote: > > >At 12:49 PM 1/2/02 -0500, Michael Brody wrote: > > > > > >>If the registrar has put up the money to hold the domain then > > don't they > > >>have some form of rights to the domain? The registrar is in > > fact holding > > >>the domains because they have put up their money to hold the names. > > >> > > >>michael > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >No. ---- Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049 Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate ----
