----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:40 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line
> Thanks, Ken. > > After reading the section about "autorenew" in the contract at > http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/info/registry-agmt-appc-i-26apr01.htm > there is no doubt that it is a mechanism of convenience for V$ and the > Registrars, rather than the tender of any type of ownership rights to the > Registrar. > I read the same contact and get something completely different. (I guess that's why we have lawyers.) Anyway, there is no mention of why there is a grace period, only that there is one. There is also no mention of what can (beyond delete, renew or transfer) and can't be done in that time period. The only thing beyond doubt is that TUCOWS has been charged money, and the name isn't available to any other registrar. I would say that gives TUCOWS freedom and control......... at least for 45 days. Dennis Hisey > At 01:15 PM 1/2/02 -0500, Ken Joy wrote: > >My two cents on this one... > > > >I believe the only reason we have to pay for domains on expiry is because > >Verisign has that 'autorenew' feature on a domains expiry.....some other > >registries don't work that way....I think it's more a comprimise that was > >made when fitting the rules from the Single Registrar model into the new > >reality of multiple registrars...and not something we can infer 'ownership' > >from. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Ken > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Brody > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:14 PM > > > To: Don Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Scott Allen is full of x- that is way out of line > > > > > > > > > then we disagree. > > > > > > michael > > > > > > At 11:57 AM 1/2/2002 -0600, Don Brown wrote: > > > >At 12:49 PM 1/2/02 -0500, Michael Brody wrote: > > > > > > > >>If the registrar has put up the money to hold the domain then > > > don't they > > > >>have some form of rights to the domain? The registrar is in > > > fact holding > > > >>the domains because they have put up their money to hold the names. > > > >> > > > >>michael > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >No. > > > ---- > Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net > PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049 > Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate > ----
