Hi,

> > I tried setting the namerserver for a domain to point to a DNS name
supplied
> > by one of those "dynamic DNS" places, but the Manage Interface
complained
> > that it was "Unable to add nameserver: Command failed: unable to verify
> > existence of nameserver xxxx.xxxxxx.com "
>
> That message just means that a name server host record does not exist in
> the registry.  To get rid of the error, just have the owner of the domain
> you are trying to use as the name server, register the ns hostname at
> their registrar.
>

Which domain are you referring to?  The domain under which the "dynamic DNS"
name is registered, or the domain for which I am trying to establish name
service?

Thanks again,
David

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: OT: DNS without a static IP?


> Hello,
>
> This is a tad off-topic, but I figured that if anyone would know, it would
> be the folks on this list...
>
> I have always been under the assumption that you NEED at least two static
IP
> addresses to set up DNS service usable by second level domain names.  Is
> there any way around this?
>
> I tried setting the namerserver for a domain to point to a DNS name
supplied
> by one of those "dynamic DNS" places, but the Manage Interface complained
> that it was "Unable to add nameserver: Command failed: unable to verify
> existence of nameserver xxxx.xxxxxx.com "
>
> BACKGROUND:
>
> This has never been a problem for me, as I simply resell virtual hosting
> plans for the few webdesign clients of mine that wish me to take care of
> such things.
>
> Now, however, I have started to receive requests for "domain parking" type
> services...  But, between what OpenSRS charges for domain names, and what
my
> ISP charges for parking, there is no way I can resell this sort of thing.
>
> Setting up a "domain parking" server at home on my DSL line would seem to
be
> a perfect solution.  (At least until I can afford a colo server
> someplace...)
>
> Thanks so much,
> David
>

Reply via email to