What does this mean on a practical level? This is much too vague. Suppose that Microsoft is the registrant of word.info and they decide at some time in the future to rename their wordprocessor and sell the domain word.info. They sell it, say, to me, having no trademark on 'word'. This means that anyone who has, can UDRP me??
On Tue, 14 May 2002, at 09:15 [=GMT-0400], Scott Allan wrote: > And, Neulevel responds: > > +----------------------- > > Neither NeuLevel nor NeuStar intends to assume the role of the USPTO and > other patent offices around the world. Therefore, while we required trade > mark information for the initial registration of the domain names, we will > not require updated records for the names to remain registered. > > However, it is the responsibility of the registrant to keep their records > with the trade mark office(s) updated in case a third party challenges > their registration of the names at a later date. > > +------------------------------ > > Regards, > > sA > > At 05:58 AM 5/8/02 -0400, Scott Allan wrote: > >On Wed, 8 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Maybe I should clarify my questions.? > > > >Sure! > > > > > Transfers after Challenge Period / Challenges NOT based on a decision by an > > > Arbitrator (WIPO,NAF,...) > > > >Right. > > > > > What about the trademark information after a transfer (ordinary transfer > > > (NOT based on a decision by an Arbitrator (WIPO,NAF,...))) of a .info > > or .us > > > sunrise domain? > > > >We are still waiting for Neulevel to respond (to be fair, we are waiting > >for clarification on some small points). > > > > > Does the trademark information of the old (sunrise) registrant still > > have to > > > show up in the whois information? > > > >For .info names, the answer has been posted. Again: > > > >"If the name is a sunrise name the new owner should update with their > >trademark information. If it is a landrush or real-time name the new > >owner should update with there (sic) information only." > > > >and further: > > > >What if the name is a sunrise name, but the new registrant does not > >have TM info? > > > >"They are subject to the rules of the sunrise period, which state you > >must have a trademark that meets the requirements." > > > > > Or should it be updated to reflect the trademark of the new owner in case > > > the new owner has a qualified trademark? > > > >If it was a sunrise name, and the new owner has a mark, the info should > >be updated. > > > > > Or should it be deleted in case the new owner has no qualified trademark > > > information? > > > >If it is a sunrise name, the registrant must have a mark.If it is not a > >sunrise name, no mark info is needed. > > > >I hope this helps - > > > >sA > > Scott Allan > Director OpenSRS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
