When was the public comment period? Swerve
> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Tucows Inc. > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:53:40 -0500 > To: "'Marc Schneiders'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Swerve'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Discuss List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update [.com/.net & .name] - 13/02/03 > > My question is where you guys were during the public comment periods > while this policy was being put together? > > > > -rwr > > > > > "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an > idiot." > - Steven Wright > > Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/ > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Schneiders >> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:43 PM >> To: Swerve >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discuss List >> Subject: Re: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update [.com/.net & .name] >> - 13/02/03 >> >> >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, at 08:26 [=GMT-0500], Swerve wrote: >> >>> Are the key email addresses of the main controllers within Icann >>> available to the general public? >> >> Email addresses of the members of the Board are available >> from their bios, linked from >> > http://www.icann.org/general/abouticann.htm > > (In other words click on name, then you get bio, there is a link to > email > there.) > > More contact addresses for ICANN: > > http://www.icann.org/general/contact.htm > >> How 'bout top level verisign folks email addresses? > > There is one pretty top person's email here: > > http://www.dnso.org/constituency/gtld/gtld.html > > And you may found more by looking at the mailing list archives of > registrars at the same website. > -- > [14] I am not a lawyer. > http://logoff.org/ > >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:34:48 -0800 (PST) >>> >>>> These fees are going to be as hard as hell to explain to irate >>>> clients. >>> >>> Just blame ICANN and refer them to ICANN's website: >>> >>> http://www.icann.org/registrars/redemption-proposal-14feb02.htm >>> >> > >
