Hey Alex,

Alex Kozak <[email protected]> writes:

> I'd love to have a conversation about this at the conference... would be
> interesting to hear everyone's perspective. I think this is a great debate
> to have.
>

Unfortunately I missed the conference this year. Did any conversation
about it happen?

> John you know I agree with the ideals of free software, but I think I have a
> more pragmatic view when it comes to Google. Does the increased risk to
> "corporate interference" and  reduced autonomy outweigh the potential
> benefits of these technologies? For a school without any collaboration
> systems, and little capacity to deploy one, the Google option would clearly
> be a net win for education and the university's mission to educate. And it
> would be a win for free culture in that the capabilities for collaboration
> and learning presented by the internet are being harnessed by the
> institutions who could most benefit from their use.
>

I understand the appeal of this argument, but it accepts the status quo
as a given, ignoring the leadership role that universities have
(imperfectly) had, and what they are capable of. The university has the
choice to either be part of the demand for freedom or to instead support
lack of freedom and expect someone else to take the leadership role. I
sure am glad universities continued the growth of the Internet and
standardized email instead of going the direction of private AOL-like
networks.

As Asheesh points out, to require Google Services is to require student
and faculty disclosure of their academic work and communications to both
the government and a corporation. This does strike me as a much more
sinister kind of corporate interference than hanging sponsorship banners
up in the student union or the like. It also means relying on code that
no one at the university has ever seen, so it means simply trusting a
corporation to do the right thing.

I think your way of framing this also creates a much wider technology
gap than there is. Google services obviously have features that add
appeal, but let's be honest about what the actual damage to the
university's mission from not making their use *mandatory* is, and let's
also remember that the largest successful collaborative writing and
research project in history is run using exclusively free software...

> I definitely agree that other things being equal a floss solution is
> preferable over Google. And think it's even inevitable that free software
> will compete with Google apps-like services. But in the meantime should
> schools not be encouraging the use of new technology until the floss
> solution is as optimal as Google?
>

There's no "in the meantime" in the current way these decisions are
being made -- to adopt Google services is to actively undercut and work
against the demand for free software solutions (which may or may not be
services in the traditional sense). Universities are large and slow. If
they change to Google now, they aren't going to want to change again to
a free software system in 3 years, even if an awesome one does exist.

We also can't impose the "in the meantime" rationale we wish were there
on the decision -- when the decision is made based on cost, that's the
rationale -- not this desire you're expressing to benefit collaborative
or free culture projects. Failing to oppose a decision made on a poor
rationale simply because an alternate rationale could justify it better
is a dangerous path to take. When a decision is at best pro-free-culture
because of incidental side effects, that's a deceptive and often harmful
kind of win. 

If universities were *actually* saying, "We're going to use Google
services now, because we need that functionality to support
collaboration, but we'll continue to support development of free
software alternatives with an eye toward re-acquiring our academic
independence in 2015," then this would be a much different discussion.

>From what I've seen, that's not what they're saying. What they're saying
is more akin to, "It's cheaper, and software is just part of the
infrastructure, like the air conditioning, and Google is popular."
That's not something we should be okay with.

-- 
-John Sullivan
-http://wjsullivan.net
-GPG Key: AE8600B6

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to