> Hello, all!
>
> I'm writing to you today to announce LectureLeaks, our new platform
> for recording and sharing your university lectures. We have released
> two applications, one for Android and one for iPhone, which allow you
> to record your lectures and send them to our website,
> LectureLeaks.com, where anybody can listen to them for free. You can
> also listen to other lectures directly through the app. Oh, and of
> course, all of the applications and the server software are free and
> open source, and the content is Creative-Commons-BY.
>
> <snip>

> Although affirmative for open education, LectureLeaks also protects
> the rights of faculty and students alike.  No matter how much
> technology we implement, we will never replace the former or
> jeopardize the latter.  Therefore, we maintain the anonymity of every
> contributing user, respond to all legitimate takedown requests, and
> share all recordings under a Creative-Commons Attribution license.
>
> <snip>

Saying simultaneously that the content is Creative Commons (especially
CCA, who is getting attribution?) and that contributing users are
anonymous seems fraught.  Either it's uploaded by the copyright holder
or an agent of the copyright holder, which is the professor or the
university, depending on the professor's contract, in which case you can
say that they agree to license it Creative-Commons by uploading it, or
it's not
Creative-Commons.  What's your rationale there?
Thanks,
Raphael Sofaer

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to