Unfortunately both are unusable to a degree. While yours uses table for layout, which I avoid like the plague and thickbox has hardcoded javascript values for getting at data, both of you suffer from requiring control of the body tag. I often in design separate html and body from each other in CSS to achieve centering the body of content without additional divs.
While I agree thickbox is a bit too specific for picture content, there are other plugins which do the same. What I'd prefer to see from plugin authors is more generic, generalized functionality that then can be combined. For example a "disable" plugin which makes a div fill the window over all of the other content. This could be used for Window and Thickbox. Then a more xhtml/css centric window plugin, and on top of that, picture based lightbox/thickbox plugins. And that was my $0.02. Thanks for your contributions. Gavin On Nov 25, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven wrote: > And use my window plugin :) > > Why? > > Thickbox was made for images > Window plugin was made for popups (dialogs) > > Just my $0.02 > > -- Gilles > > http://gilles.jquery.com/window/ > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
