I'd like to understand your definition of 'disabled' Andrei. A system cant be all things to all people, it will fail being useful to anyone in particular.
Should we ditch the mouse and keyboard for people without fine control of their muscles? A clickless interface for everyone? And for the hard of hearing - should the system have full voice recognition? And of course.. what we're really talking about here.. that sub group of 'the disabled' with reduced vision... OS's that talk to you. I present to you the 'Disabled' friendly computer http://tinyurl.com/2wecy4 OS's are platforms, on to which we build applications. Applications are solutions to unique/specific problems. Addressing the needs of a specific user group is best served with a platform wide solution dont you think? Andrei.. Andrei.. give me your answer true (o; :-p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://gamma.ixda.org/discuss?post=21080 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help
