On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:38 AM, pauric wrote: > I feel its going to be more fruitful to address the point of failure > not the system. The underlying system will change, the issue of > deficient vision does not. That point of failure lies between the > user and the system presentation layer. I think I'll call this > approach User Centered Design (o;
You can call it whatever you want, it doesn't change anything. You're still advocating to address the "point of failure" by adding another system on top of it to interpret the presentation layer instead of just making the presentation layer work for the disabled. -- Andrei Herasimchuk Principal, Involution Studios innovating the digital world e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] c. +1 408 306 6422 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help
