On Oct 7, 2007, at 8:57 PM, pauric wrote: > In a word, its an interface. A presentation layer. You dont > re-interpret the visual spectrum to audio, back down in an OS (why > not: e.g. JScript). It must be an open, standards based, solution to > be truly universal and robust.
Visual spectrum? What are you talking about? Text doesn't appear on your screen unless it was coded and rendered to do so. Windows don't move when you click and drag unless it was coded and made into an object that was clickable. Nothing on the computer screen appears unless it was *coded* to do so, and in doing so, the underlying OS knows what kind of thing it is in order to render it. > Note the K-NFB is nothing more than a digital camera and OCR module. > A simple solution that adapts to most any environment, subject text > and user. Who needs OCR? How do you think you are reading this message on your computer screen right now unless there was code to render out the specific letters in this specific order? How do you think you can grab and drag a window out of the way unless there was underlying code to do exactly that? The underlying objects are there. > It cant be rocketscience to build a dynamic OCR reader for today's > powerful desktops. It has nothing to do with OCR. -- Andrei Herasimchuk Principal, Involution Studios innovating the digital world e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] c. +1 408 306 6422 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Guidelines ............ http://beta.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://beta.ixda.org/help Unsubscribe ................ http://beta.ixda.org/unsubscribe Questions .................. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home ....................... http://beta.ixda.org
