Dmitry, Thanks for taking this on. I admit my choice of words may not have been open enough to elicit applying to a personal situation. But look what it sparked? A discussion about the scope of our responsibilities as a UX designer. I don't think that's "dangerous" or "wrong" or even intentionally "definitive". Take from it what you can get.
And I do feel this is a "division of responsibilities that made sense in his (my) mind and environment". For me, however, they're all my responsibilities. But I need this structure to keep me focused. It had nothing to do with team structure, but rather with the scope and type of work performed by each competency. How would yours look? How would you replace the word "competency"? Do you need a structure? Keep the discussion rolling. - Steve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://gamma.ixda.org/discuss?post=22177 ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
