On Dec 29, 2007, at 9:57 PM, pauric wrote:

> Andrei:"what are the other 2/3 of the story that I'm apparently  
> missing"
> you:"product design is not user centered nor technology centered. It
> always has and always will be both."
>
> Maybe my math is a little out of whack??

That was a completely other topic and has little to do with the point  
made in the other one.

> you:"The original question posed was are there design principals that
> live outside of context. My long answer to that, via example, was that
> yes, there are."
>
> And we agree, but as David points out:"interpretations and utility
> differ so widely across so many different axis"

Again, I already stated that in my response. It still has little to  
do with the original question and the answer.

> I dont think that at all, you have a valid point, and in the grander
> scheme of this discussion on fundamentals and context, the point I
> feel Dave makes is that a good designer understands one and has a good
> appreciation of the other.
>
> So it seems we're all in agreement, fantabulous.

So in other words you were just being argumentative in response to my  
post. Got it.

-- 
Andrei Herasimchuk

Principal, Involution Studios
innovating the digital world

e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c. +1 408 306 6422


________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to