On Jan 4, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Tom Illmensee wrote:

> There's a fun demonstration technique called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Billy Cox wrote:

> If it were me, I would use a simulation exercise to illustrate the  
> value of
> usability.


Now, I don't want to go off on a rant here, but this is the second  
time in a very short thread that the term "usability" has been  
substituted for "interaction design" (or simply "design"). We should  
know better and we certainly shouldn't be teaching people that they  
are the same!

Usability is a by-product of good design. It's a baseline. It's a  
characteristic. It's "hygiene." It is not the same as interaction  
design.

Now, I understand in certain regions the term "design" is never used.  
Yet. But it's the job of this organization (and by extension, its  
members) to evangelize what we do and why we do it. And to give it its  
proper name so as to increase awareness of it.

/rant


Dan







Dan Saffer
Experience Design Director, Adaptive Path
http://www.adaptivepath.com
http://www.odannyboy.com


________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to