Please see my response in the other thread. It highlights why this sort of pedantic response is without foresight or strategic thought. Why I disagreed with Tog from the beginning on his titling (as well as many others).
What I find so interesting so far is the USer centricism in the conversation. In Europe there is such a different take on interaction design vs. interface design. It's probably why Western Europe has 900% more interaction design programs. They are almost all in design programs. Since when do designers do what John Q says. We are strategic problem solvers who look for the latent problems that John Q can't articulate. If we just made what John Q wanted, we would all have Homer-mobiles (and since you are all so acquainted with John Q, I shouldn't have to explain what a Homer-mobile is.) -- dave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=25127 ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
