Their is no such thing as random without context. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Elizabeth Buie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jared wrote: > > >It is all about context. And in many, many contexts, alphabetical is > >random. > > Some people may be objecting to the characterization of alphabetical as > random because they see "random" as "unpredictable" -- which alphabetical > certainly is not... as long as you know the name of what you are looking > for. That is why I said it was arbitrary, which I think avoids the "random > = unpredictable" problem. > > Elizabeth > -- > Elizabeth Buie > Luminanze Consulting, LLC > tel +1.301.943.4168 (US) > tel +39.347.394.7022 (Italia) > fax +1.301.949.9694 (US only) > www.luminanze.com > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [email protected] > Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
