+1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1. it is very easy to restore the patches if needed.
>
> We did something similar in NetVirt and Genius already where we abandoned
> gerrits with no activity for four weeks with this message:
> "abandoned-inactivity: This gerrit was abandoned due to inactivity for more
> than four weeks. Please restore when ready."
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 I think we should do it. I had spent good 1 hour to look at lot of age
>> old openflowplugin patches to abandon them.
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Grimberg <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings folks,
>>>
>>> As I'm trying to figure out the logistics related to migrating ODL from
>>> our current identity backend to The Linux Foundation Identity (LFID)
>>> backend I've been investigating a lot of different things related to
>>> Gerrit. One of the things I noticed is that we have a lot of changes
>>> that are old and still open.
>>>
>>> We've got changes still open going all the way back to 2013! I would
>>> like to put a proposal out that we auto-abandon changes that are >6
>>> months in age and in all honesty I would like to do it for any change
>>> that is >6 weeks old but I figured that 6 months was a good starting
>>> point.
>>>
>>> Please note that this is age of last activity, not age of initial change
>>> or last patch update. So an old change that happens to have regular use
>>> for some reason (such as trigger testing) via comments should not be
>>> affected by this, even if they are, it's an abandon and not an actual
>>> removal from the system so they won't disappear, they'll just be removed
>>> from the status:open search.
>>>
>>> I'm proposing that this change happen after we finally get Carbon out
>>> the door as it's going to require a restart to Gerrit to have the
>>> configuration updated to start this.
>>>
>>> -Andy-
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew J Grimberg
>>> Lead, IT Release Engineering
>>> The Linux Foundation
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Anil
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to