On 01/16/2018 12:27 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > I think you have to use something like this in the > BUNDLE_URL: > http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
hmmm... the BUNDLE_URL is right, but our deployment script is having trouble using it. I'm looking. >> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Sam built a local distro with the remaining unmerged patches >> and I am trying some netvirt CSIT with that: >> >> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/637 >> >> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38 >> >> >> JamO >> >> >> >> On 01/16/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Brady Johnson <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> We have indeed made good progress and it looks like we're close. Should >>> we at least give it until the end of the day today? >>> >>> Related to this, since the merges started I havent been able to build >>> SFC since Friday when I sent this email [0] and I >>> still cant today. So this is something we need to resolve soon to avoid >>> schedule slips. >>> >>> [0] >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html >>> >>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> *Brady Johnson* >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> <https://twitter.com/inocybetech><http://www.inocybe.com/><https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe>Screenshot >>> 2017-02-14 at 10.43.55 AM.png >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Kitt <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In last week’s TSC call we agreed to move forward with merging the >>> odlparent 3 / yangtools 2 migration patches, with a timebox — we were >>> supposed to be able to run NetVirt CSIT yesterday. Obviously that >>> deadline has gone whizzing past and we’re still some way away from >>> running NetVirt CSIT; I’m not sure how far away... Strictly speaking, >>> all the NetVirt dependencies now pass verify (thanks to lots of work >>> by >>> Tom, Robert and Michael on Neutron in particular), so we could give >>> it >>> a shot once the patches are merged, but I also knows that OVSDB fails >>> its IT so I expect NetVirt CSIT won’t pass. >>> >>> So the question now is what do we do. Following the agreed plan, we >>> should start reverting the patches (hopefully without messing up the >>> follow-up fixes). We could formulate alternative plans, but I’m not >>> sure what the community feels about that! >>> >>> Anyway, I’m not trying to suggest a concrete solution with this >>> email, >>> I want to start the discussion. >>> >>> >>> my personal view is that the sane thing to do would be to revert and finish >>> this up on a branch in parallel, to unblock >>> folks, because the timeline proposed in >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html >>> was missed, >>> and IMHO it's likely at least several more days until things fully >>> stabilize. Through all the various 3rd party upgrades and >>> yangtools changes etc. that went into this big bump, as of right there >>> still has never been a full netvirt CSIT successfully >>> run proving non-regression, yet; that's going to happen in the coming days. >>> >>> But I believe this view is not widely shared... ;-) Part of the reasons for >>> that seem to include issues such as that the >>> multipatch job apparently doesn't work, so it is hard to test change >>> accross projects easily. I'm not sure that "let's just >>> merge and figure it out as we go along" is the best answer to that >>> problem.. but if others don't have a problem with the >>> "broken world" for a number of days, then so be it! >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> Stephen Kitt >>> Principal Software Engineer, Office of the CTO >>> Red Hat >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> release mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release >>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TSC mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc >>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> release mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> TSC mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
