FYI I am trying this patch in sandbox for the issue you observed in CSIT:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/67224/ 
<https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/67224/>

BR/Luis


> On Jan 16, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> good idea Sam. I'll try that.
> 
> btw, you could do a curl on restconf/modules and get a 200 right?
> 
> JamO
> 
> On 01/16/2018 01:55 PM, Sam Hague wrote:
>> I loaded that distro locally and did feature:install odl-netvirt-openstack. 
>> That worked fine. Maybe we can use the patch you
>> added recently to not use the bootfeatures?
>> 
>> On Jan 16, 2018 4:02 PM, "Jamo Luhrsen" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Thanks Luis,
>> 
>>    that fixed it, and I ran new jobs already. ODL did not come "UP", so we 
>> have something to fix still.
>> 
>>    I'll be debugging, but something weird ended up in the features cfg file.
>>    there is an UUID in the featuresBoot and featuresRepositories lines
>> 
>>    
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/638/
>>    
>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/638/>
>> 
>>    JamO
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    On 01/16/2018 12:38 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
>>> I mean the format of the URL so that script can take it :)
>>> 
>>> Just add 2 folders (/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT) in you HTTP server and it should 
>>> work, for example:
>>    
>> http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>    
>> <http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip>
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 01/16/2018 12:27 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
>>>>> I think you have to use something like this in the
>>>>> BUNDLE_URL: 
>>>>> http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>    
>> <http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip>
>>>> 
>>>> hmmm... the BUNDLE_URL is right, but our deployment script is having 
>>>> trouble using
>>>> it. I'm looking.
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sam built a local distro with the remaining unmerged patches
>>>>>> and I am trying some netvirt CSIT with that:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>    
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/637
>>    
>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/637>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>    
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38
>>    
>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> JamO
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 01/16/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Brady Johnson <[email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     We have indeed made good progress and it looks like we're close. 
>>>>>>> Should we at least give it until the end of the
>>    day today?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     Related to this, since the merges started I havent been able to 
>>>>>>> build SFC since Friday when I sent this email
>>    [0] and I
>>>>>>>     still cant today. So this is something we need to resolve soon to 
>>>>>>> avoid schedule slips.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     [0] 
>>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html
>>    
>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html>
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html
>>    
>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     *Brady Johnson*
>>>>>>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     <https://twitter.com/inocybetech 
>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/inocybetech>><http://www.inocybe.com/
>>    
>> <http://www.inocybe.com/>><https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe
>>    
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe>>Screenshot
>>>>>>>     2017-02-14 at 10.43.55 AM.png 
>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw
>>    <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Kitt <[email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         In last week’s TSC call we agreed to move forward with merging 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>         odlparent 3 / yangtools 2 migration patches, with a timebox — 
>>>>>>> we were
>>>>>>>         supposed to be able to run NetVirt CSIT yesterday. Obviously 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>         deadline has gone whizzing past and we’re still some way away 
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>         running NetVirt CSIT; I’m not sure how far away... Strictly 
>>>>>>> speaking,
>>>>>>>         all the NetVirt dependencies now pass verify (thanks to lots of 
>>>>>>> work by
>>>>>>>         Tom, Robert and Michael on Neutron in particular), so we could 
>>>>>>> give it
>>>>>>>         a shot once the patches are merged, but I also knows that OVSDB 
>>>>>>> fails
>>>>>>>         its IT so I expect NetVirt CSIT won’t pass.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         So the question now is what do we do. Following the agreed 
>>>>>>> plan, we
>>>>>>>         should start reverting the patches (hopefully without messing 
>>>>>>> up the
>>>>>>>         follow-up fixes). We could formulate alternative plans, but I’m 
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>         sure what the community feels about that!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         Anyway, I’m not trying to suggest a concrete solution with this 
>>>>>>> email,
>>>>>>>         I want to start the discussion.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> my personal view is that the sane thing to do would be to revert and 
>>>>>>> finish this up on a branch in parallel, to unblock
>>>>>>> folks, because the timeline proposed in 
>>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html
>>    
>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html> 
>> was missed,
>>>>>>> and IMHO it's likely at least several more days until things fully 
>>>>>>> stabilize. Through all the various 3rd party
>>    upgrades and
>>>>>>> yangtools changes etc. that went into this big bump, as of right there 
>>>>>>> still has never been a full netvirt CSIT
>>    successfully
>>>>>>> run proving non-regression, yet; that's going to happen in the coming 
>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But I believe this view is not widely shared... ;-) Part of the reasons 
>>>>>>> for that seem to include issues such as
>>    that the
>>>>>>> multipatch job apparently doesn't work, so it is hard to test change 
>>>>>>> accross projects easily. I'm not sure that
>>    "let's just
>>>>>>> merge and figure it out as we go along" is the best answer to that 
>>>>>>> problem.. but if others don't have a problem
>>    with the
>>>>>>> "broken world" for a number of days, then so be it!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         Regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         --
>>>>>>>         Stephen Kitt
>>>>>>>         Principal Software Engineer, Office of the CTO
>>>>>>>         Red Hat
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>         release mailing list
>>>>>>>         [email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    <mailto:[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>>         https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release> 
>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>     TSC mailing list
>>>>>>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>>>     https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
>>>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
>>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> release mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release 
>>>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> TSC mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
>>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    TSC mailing list
>>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
>> 

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to