Yeah, thats another thing, we may have to change current CSIT scripts to accommodate new features boot file format.
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Luis, > > that fixed it, and I ran new jobs already. ODL did not come "UP", so we have > something to fix still. > > I'll be debugging, but something weird ended up in the features cfg file. > there is an UUID in the featuresBoot and featuresRepositories lines > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/638/ > > JamO > > > > On 01/16/2018 12:38 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: >> I mean the format of the URL so that script can take it :) >> >> Just add 2 folders (/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT) in you HTTP server and it should >> work, for example: >> http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip >> >>> On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/16/2018 12:27 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: >>>> I think you have to use something like this in the >>>> BUNDLE_URL: >>>> http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip >>> >>> hmmm... the BUNDLE_URL is right, but our deployment script is having >>> trouble using >>> it. I'm looking. >>> >>>>> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sam built a local distro with the remaining unmerged patches >>>>> and I am trying some netvirt CSIT with that: >>>>> >>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/637 >>>>> >>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> JamO >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 01/16/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Brady Johnson <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We have indeed made good progress and it looks like we're close. >>>>>> Should we at least give it until the end of the day today? >>>>>> >>>>>> Related to this, since the merges started I havent been able to build >>>>>> SFC since Friday when I sent this email [0] and I >>>>>> still cant today. So this is something we need to resolve soon to >>>>>> avoid schedule slips. >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] >>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Brady Johnson* >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/inocybetech><http://www.inocybe.com/><https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe>Screenshot >>>>>> 2017-02-14 at 10.43.55 AM.png >>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Kitt <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> In last week’s TSC call we agreed to move forward with merging the >>>>>> odlparent 3 / yangtools 2 migration patches, with a timebox — we >>>>>> were >>>>>> supposed to be able to run NetVirt CSIT yesterday. Obviously that >>>>>> deadline has gone whizzing past and we’re still some way away from >>>>>> running NetVirt CSIT; I’m not sure how far away... Strictly >>>>>> speaking, >>>>>> all the NetVirt dependencies now pass verify (thanks to lots of >>>>>> work by >>>>>> Tom, Robert and Michael on Neutron in particular), so we could >>>>>> give it >>>>>> a shot once the patches are merged, but I also knows that OVSDB >>>>>> fails >>>>>> its IT so I expect NetVirt CSIT won’t pass. >>>>>> >>>>>> So the question now is what do we do. Following the agreed plan, we >>>>>> should start reverting the patches (hopefully without messing up >>>>>> the >>>>>> follow-up fixes). We could formulate alternative plans, but I’m not >>>>>> sure what the community feels about that! >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, I’m not trying to suggest a concrete solution with this >>>>>> email, >>>>>> I want to start the discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> my personal view is that the sane thing to do would be to revert and >>>>>> finish this up on a branch in parallel, to unblock >>>>>> folks, because the timeline proposed in >>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html >>>>>> was missed, >>>>>> and IMHO it's likely at least several more days until things fully >>>>>> stabilize. Through all the various 3rd party upgrades and >>>>>> yangtools changes etc. that went into this big bump, as of right there >>>>>> still has never been a full netvirt CSIT successfully >>>>>> run proving non-regression, yet; that's going to happen in the coming >>>>>> days. >>>>>> >>>>>> But I believe this view is not widely shared... ;-) Part of the reasons >>>>>> for that seem to include issues such as that the >>>>>> multipatch job apparently doesn't work, so it is hard to test change >>>>>> accross projects easily. I'm not sure that "let's just >>>>>> merge and figure it out as we go along" is the best answer to that >>>>>> problem.. but if others don't have a problem with the >>>>>> "broken world" for a number of days, then so be it! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Stephen Kitt >>>>>> Principal Software Engineer, Office of the CTO >>>>>> Red Hat >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> release mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release >>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> TSC mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc >>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> release mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> TSC mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc >>>> >> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
