Hi,
    If there was an option to do such major impact changes on a different 
branch, and then get it merged to main branch when things are stable 
enough.(given that such a version bump-up is happening almost at the same time 
as we are going to do a branch cut), would have been far better.
   But would like to tell that some of the issues we had with the previous 
versions seem to go off once we got a stable genius distribution(eg : ssh 
related problems as sshd got upgraded).
Thanks,
Faseela

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luis Gomez
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 5:58 AM
To: Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>; OpenDaylight Discuss 
<[email protected]>; Release ([email protected]) 
<[email protected]>; tsc <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] odlparent 3 / yangtools 2 migration

FYI I am trying this patch in sandbox for the issue you observed in CSIT:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/67224/

BR/Luis


On Jan 16, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Jamo Luhrsen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

good idea Sam. I'll try that.

btw, you could do a curl on restconf/modules and get a 200 right?

JamO

On 01/16/2018 01:55 PM, Sam Hague wrote:

I loaded that distro locally and did feature:install odl-netvirt-openstack. 
That worked fine. Maybe we can use the patch you
added recently to not use the bootfeatures?

On Jan 16, 2018 4:02 PM, "Jamo Luhrsen" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

   Thanks Luis,

   that fixed it, and I ran new jobs already. ODL did not come "UP", so we have 
something to fix still.

   I'll be debugging, but something weird ended up in the features cfg file.
   there is an UUID in the featuresBoot and featuresRepositories lines

   
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/638/
   
<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/638/>

   JamO



   On 01/16/2018 12:38 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:

I mean the format of the URL so that script can take it :)

Just add 2 folders (/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT) in you HTTP server and it should 
work, for example:
   
http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
   
<http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip>



On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Jamo Luhrsen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:



On 01/16/2018 12:27 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:

I think you have to use something like this in the
BUNDLE_URL: 
http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
   
<http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip>


hmmm... the BUNDLE_URL is right, but our deployment script is having trouble 
using
it. I'm looking.


On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Jamo Luhrsen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
   <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:


Sam built a local distro with the remaining unmerged patches
and I am trying some netvirt CSIT with that:

   
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/637
   
<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-oxygen/637>


   
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38
   
<https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38>



JamO



On 01/16/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote:

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Brady Johnson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
   <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:


    We have indeed made good progress and it looks like we're close. Should we 
at least give it until the end of the
   day today?


    Related to this, since the merges started I havent been able to build SFC 
since Friday when I sent this email
   [0] and I

    still cant today. So this is something we need to resolve soon to avoid 
schedule slips.

    [0] 
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html
   <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html>

    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html
   <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.html>>



    Regards,

    *Brady Johnson*
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>

    <https://twitter.com/inocybetech 
<https://twitter.com/inocybetech>><http://www.inocybe.com/
   
<http://www.inocybe.com/>><https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe
   
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe>>Screenshot

    2017-02-14 at 10.43.55 AM.png 
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw
   <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw>>




    On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Kitt 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
   <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:


        Hi,

        In last week’s TSC call we agreed to move forward with merging the
        odlparent 3 / yangtools 2 migration patches, with a timebox — we were
        supposed to be able to run NetVirt CSIT yesterday. Obviously that
        deadline has gone whizzing past and we’re still some way away from
        running NetVirt CSIT; I’m not sure how far away... Strictly speaking,
        all the NetVirt dependencies now pass verify (thanks to lots of work by
        Tom, Robert and Michael on Neutron in particular), so we could give it
        a shot once the patches are merged, but I also knows that OVSDB fails
        its IT so I expect NetVirt CSIT won’t pass.

        So the question now is what do we do. Following the agreed plan, we
        should start reverting the patches (hopefully without messing up the
        follow-up fixes). We could formulate alternative plans, but I’m not
        sure what the community feels about that!

        Anyway, I’m not trying to suggest a concrete solution with this email,
        I want to start the discussion.


my personal view is that the sane thing to do would be to revert and finish 
this up on a branch in parallel, to unblock
folks, because the timeline proposed in 
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html
   <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html> 
was missed,

and IMHO it's likely at least several more days until things fully stabilize. 
Through all the various 3rd party
   upgrades and

yangtools changes etc. that went into this big bump, as of right there still 
has never been a full netvirt CSIT
   successfully

run proving non-regression, yet; that's going to happen in the coming days.

But I believe this view is not widely shared... ;-) Part of the reasons for 
that seem to include issues such as
   that the

multipatch job apparently doesn't work, so it is hard to test change accross 
projects easily. I'm not sure that
   "let's just

merge and figure it out as we go along" is the best answer to that problem.. 
but if others don't have a problem
   with the

"broken world" for a number of days, then so be it!


        Regards,

        --
        Stephen Kitt
        Principal Software Engineer, Office of the CTO
        Red Hat

        _______________________________________________
        release mailing list
        [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>
   <mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>

        https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
   <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release> 
<https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
   <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>>




    _______________________________________________
    TSC mailing list
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>>

    https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
<https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
   <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
<https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>>





_______________________________________________
release mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release 
<https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>
_______________________________________________
TSC mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
<https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>


   _______________________________________________
   TSC mailing list
   [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>
   https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc 
<https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to