For the SFC version bump patch [0] I need to merge this patch [1] first,
but its failing [2] with this:


*00:46:35* [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.opendaylight.odlparent:karaf-plugin:2.0.5:populate-local-repo
(populate-local-repo) on project karaf: Failed to execute: Invalid
path. Syntax mvn:[repository_url!]groupId/artifactId[/[version]/[type]]
-> [Help 1]*00:46:35* [ERROR] *00:46:35* [ERROR] To see the full stack
trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.*00:46:35*
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
logging.*00:46:35* [ERROR] *00:46:35* [ERROR] For more information
about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following
articles:*00:46:35* [ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException*00:46:35*
[ERROR] *00:46:35* [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can
resume the build with the command*00:46:35* [ERROR]   mvn <goals> -rf
:karaf



Does anyone know anything about this failure??


[0] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66513/
[1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/67219/
[2]
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/sfc-distribution-check-oxygen/300/console


Regards,

*Brady Johnson*
[email protected]

<https://twitter.com/inocybetech> <http://www.inocybe.com/>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe>
[image:
Screenshot 2017-02-14 at 10.43.55 AM.png]
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw>



On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>     If there was an option to do such major impact changes on a different
> branch, and then get it merged to main branch when things are stable
> enough.(given that such a version bump-up is happening almost at the same
> time as we are going to do a branch cut), would have been far better.
>
>    But would like to tell that some of the issues we had with the previous
> versions seem to go off once we got a stable genius distribution(eg : ssh
> related problems as sshd got upgraded).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Faseela
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Luis Gomez
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 17, 2018 5:58 AM
> *To:* Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>; OpenDaylight Discuss <
> [email protected]>; Release ([email protected])
> <[email protected]>; tsc <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] odlparent 3 / yangtools 2
> migration
>
>
>
> FYI I am trying this patch in sandbox for the issue you observed in CSIT:
>
>
>
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/67224/
>
>
>
> BR/Luis
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> good idea Sam. I'll try that.
>
> btw, you could do a curl on restconf/modules and get a 200 right?
>
> JamO
>
> On 01/16/2018 01:55 PM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
> I loaded that distro locally and did feature:install
> odl-netvirt-openstack. That worked fine. Maybe we can use the patch you
> added recently to not use the bootfeatures?
>
> On Jan 16, 2018 4:02 PM, "Jamo Luhrsen" <[email protected] <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
>    Thanks Luis,
>
>    that fixed it, and I ran new jobs already. ODL did not come "UP", so we
> have something to fix still.
>
>    I'll be debugging, but something weird ended up in the features cfg
> file.
>    there is an UUID in the featuresBoot and featuresRepositories lines
>
>    https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/
> netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-
> gate-stateful-oxygen/638/
>    <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/
> netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-
> gate-stateful-oxygen/638/>
>
>    JamO
>
>
>
>    On 01/16/2018 12:38 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
>
> I mean the format of the URL so that script can take it :)
>
> Just add 2 folders (/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT) in you HTTP server and it
> should work, for example:
>
>    http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/
> karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
>    <http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT/
> karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip>
>
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/16/2018 12:27 PM, Luis Gomez wrote:
>
> I think you have to use something like this in the
> BUNDLE_URL: http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*/
> karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
>
>    <http://www.luhrsenlounge.net/odl/*karaf/0.8.0-SNAPSHOT*
> /karaf-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.zip>
>
>
> hmmm... the BUNDLE_URL is right, but our deployment script is having
> trouble using
> it. I'm looking.
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected] <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>
>
>    <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>
>
> Sam built a local distro with the remaining unmerged patches
> and I am trying some netvirt CSIT with that:
>
>    https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/
> netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-
> gate-stateful-oxygen/637
>    <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/
> netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-
> gate-stateful-oxygen/637>
>
>
>
>    https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/
> netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-
> gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38
>    <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/user/jluhrsen/my-views/view/
> netvirt%20csit/job/netvirt-csit-1node-openstack-ocata-
> gate-stateful-snat-conntrack-oxygen/38>
>
>
>
> JamO
>
>
>
> On 01/16/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Vorburger wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Brady Johnson <[email protected] <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>
>
>    <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>
>
>     We have indeed made good progress and it looks like we're close.
> Should we at least give it until the end of the
>
>    day today?
>
>
>     Related to this, since the merges started I havent been able to build
> SFC since Friday when I sent this email
>
>    [0] and I
>
>     still cant today. So this is something we need to resolve soon to
> avoid schedule slips.
>
>     [0] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-
> January/013337.html
>
>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.
> html>
>
>     <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-
> January/013337.html
>
>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013337.
> html>>
>
>
>
>     Regards,
>
>     *Brady Johnson*
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>
> <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>>
>
>     <https://twitter.com/inocybetech <https://twitter.com/inocybetech>><
> http://www.inocybe.com/
>
>    <http://www.inocybe.com/>><https://www.linkedin.com/
> company/2661537?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%
> 3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%
> 2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe
>    <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2661537?trk=tyah&;
> trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Acompany%2CclickedEntityId%
> 3A2661537%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1441300264767%2Ctas%3Ainocybe
> >>Screenshot
>
>     2017-02-14 at 10.43.55 AM.png <https://www.youtube.com/
> channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw
>
>    <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9uUWABdPR0Je9Du_15FCkw>>
>
>
>
>
>     On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Kitt <[email protected] <
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>
>
>    <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>
>
>         Hi,
>
>         In last week’s TSC call we agreed to move forward with merging the
>         odlparent 3 / yangtools 2 migration patches, with a timebox — we
> were
>         supposed to be able to run NetVirt CSIT yesterday. Obviously that
>         deadline has gone whizzing past and we’re still some way away from
>         running NetVirt CSIT; I’m not sure how far away... Strictly
> speaking,
>         all the NetVirt dependencies now pass verify (thanks to lots of
> work by
>         Tom, Robert and Michael on Neutron in particular), so we could
> give it
>         a shot once the patches are merged, but I also knows that OVSDB
> fails
>         its IT so I expect NetVirt CSIT won’t pass.
>
>         So the question now is what do we do. Following the agreed plan, we
>         should start reverting the patches (hopefully without messing up
> the
>         follow-up fixes). We could formulate alternative plans, but I’m not
>         sure what the community feels about that!
>
>         Anyway, I’m not trying to suggest a concrete solution with this
> email,
>         I want to start the discussion.
>
>
> my personal view is that the sane thing to do would be to revert and
> finish this up on a branch in parallel, to unblock
> folks, because the timeline proposed in https://lists.opendaylight.
> org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.html
>
>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2018-January/013336.
> html> was missed,
>
> and IMHO it's likely at least several more days until things fully
> stabilize. Through all the various 3rd party
>
>    upgrades and
>
> yangtools changes etc. that went into this big bump, as of right there
> still has never been a full netvirt CSIT
>
>    successfully
>
> run proving non-regression, yet; that's going to happen in the coming days.
>
> But I believe this view is not widely shared... ;-) Part of the reasons
> for that seem to include issues such as
>
>    that the
>
> multipatch job apparently doesn't work, so it is hard to test change
> accross projects easily. I'm not sure that
>
>    "let's just
>
> merge and figure it out as we go along" is the best answer to that
> problem.. but if others don't have a problem
>
>    with the
>
> "broken world" for a number of days, then so be it!
>
>
>         Regards,
>
>         --
>         Stephen Kitt
>         Principal Software Engineer, Office of the CTO
>         Red Hat
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         release mailing list
>         [email protected] <mailto:release@lists.
> opendaylight.org <[email protected]>>
>
>    <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>>
>
>         https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>
>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release> <
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     TSC mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>
>
>    <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>>
>
>     https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc <
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
>
>    <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc <
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> release mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release <
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TSC mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>>
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc <
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
>
>
>
>
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    TSC mailing list
>    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>>
>    https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc <
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> release mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to