Maria, all, I would slightly disagree here, because I think all data can be of various degrees of quality and freshness. Maria, I can re-read your entire message with '(any) data' instead if 'open data' and it makes much more sense to me. Commercial data, paid data, authoritative data, open data, VGI data: you always need to assess if they are fit for (your) purpose. Your proposal "Methods and FOSS tools for assessing open data quality" could convey the false message that only open data needs checking and has inherent flaws.
On a side note, in the definition aspect, I would take care of splitting: - 'good' open data: data released by producer, that anyone can read or re-use (for transparency, accountability and public participation, support technological innovation and economic growth, new kinds of digital applications and services, ...) - 'bad' open data: labelled 'open data' by the producer, but lacking in: poor format (not structured, proprietary ...), poor quality (data, metadata, up-to-date, completeness ...), poor access (not searchable, not documented, fee, ...) ... - 'more than' open data: people can read AND write, re-use AND contribute, assess AND improve; this is more free/libre. This is OpenStreetMap for generic geodata, other VGI for thematic data ... Best regards. Benoît On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli <maria.brove...@polimi.it> wrote: > In my opinion another relevant topic is open data and its quality, i.e. > methods and tools for assessing open data quality. > > Some data has metadata quality, some data has not. > > Before using them we have to be sure that the characteristics of the data > fit our exigences. For instance open data are useless if they are not > updated or they are bad quality. > > Therefore, I would add to your list > > Methods and FOSS tools for assessing open data quality. >> ... >> po 17. 10. 2016 v 5:08 odesílatel Sanghee Shin <shs...@gaia3d.com >> <mailto:shs...@gaia3d.com>> napsal: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Can anybody share presentation file about the OSGeo and open data, >> if any? I’m invited to give a keynote talk at ‘Open Data in Action >> Conference’[1] in Korea and I don’t want to make the file from the >> scratch. >> >> FYI, OSGeo Korea[2], R Korea[3], Open Data Institute(ODI) Seoul[4], >> Open Knowledge(OK) Korea[5] will co-host the event on 15th Nov near >> Seoul. The main theme of the conference is ‘Experiment on Open Data >> based Society.’ Anybody who has similar interest can join this >> conference. >> >> Kind regards, >> 신상희 >> >> [1]http://event.r-kor.org/ >> [2]http://www.osgeo.kr/ >> [3]http://r-kor.org/ >> [4]http://seoul.theodi.org/ >> [5]http://okfn.kr/ >> --- >> Shin, Sanghee >> Gaia3D, Inc. - The GeoSpatial Company >> http://www.gaia3d.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > mobile: 248.982.3609 > and...@fortiusone.com > http://highearthorbit.com > > http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
