Just so we’re clear – the geopackage stuff in WWSK is a fork of (i.e. copy 
from) the community modules in geotools and geoserver. For example, see 


Some changes have been made (including rebranding the Java namespaces). Clearly 
the changes can’t just be taken from WWSK, as noted in the OSGeo links in Ian’s 


I just hadn’t seen any communication or PRs, and wondered if that was the 
intent. I’m a bit surprised by the wording in your email though – if you have 
contributions, then why not just propose them like other contributors do?




From: Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) [mailto:patrick.ho...@nasa.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2018 3:21 AM
To: Ian Turton <ijtur...@gmail.com>
Cc: br...@frogmouth.net; OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESA-NASA WebWorldWind


Our GeoPackage work to facilitate that via GeoServer is extensive and carefully 
architected. And we’ve discovered some other good things that would certainly 
advance GeoServer. 



NASA is prepared to work with someone close to GeoServer for these features and 
improvements to be ‘folded-in.’ We are glad to coordinate with a most 
appropriate person who would take the lead in that effort. 




Discuss mailing list

Reply via email to