Another option is to install non-permanent lighting, to make existing rooms more useful, as Justin and Thor were able to do over one workbench.
>From talking to Adrian yesterday, the lights which have already been bought could be easily modified to be plugged into the wall for now. Floor or desk lamps would help in the lounge. I know this won't fix our fundamental electrical problems... but it would help us make more use of the space we have. On Oct 12, 2012 9:36 PM, "Michael Kozakewich" < [email protected]> wrote: > It's a bit of a fallacy to outline a couple options and tell everyone > those are the only things we can do. > > We can focus on gaining money in other ways, like by encouraging donations > for classes we throw and by hosting paid functions. > > -----Original Message----- From: Mark Jenkins > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] big picture options and electrical > > On 10/12/12 14:59, Adrian Stoness wrote: > >> can we fix the workshop lights allready been wanting to do it but not >> going to touch them till i have permission >> > > Hopefully we're close to making a decision on the big issues now so we > can see if the lighting should be done on its own or part of a bigger > package. > > In terms of questions and order of questions put to a vote, I see two > major variants: > > Process #A > 1) Do the members support the new lease being signed? > 2) If yes on 1), do the members support funding immediate electrical > renovations using our reserves + operating revenues to pay back a loan > 3) If yes on 2), do the members support restructuring what our member > fees and member responsibilities are upon the completion of those > renovations? (assuming renovation loan will be paid back around $350 a > month which would soak up our discretionary budget) > > Process #B > We put all four major options to some kind of preference voting system. > > > I suspect most folks will prefer process A over B because its simpler. > > But I'd like to express my preference for B because I would not like to > go through process A and have the last question lead to the result 1-Y > 2-Y 3-N as I prefer 1-N over that. At the same time, I'm okay with 1-Y > 2-Y 3-Y (Jenkins plan) and 1-Y 2-N (SnikneJ). Process A has a bias > against my preferences. :( > > (and every process has a bias against somebody's preferences, and no > process guarantees a majority happy with the outcom) > > Once we go through a process that addresses these questions then we'll > know if major electrical renovations are happening soon or not. If > they're not happening soon, then I'd be all for us hiring an electrician > to just replace the fixtures or perhaps allow the internal option to go > foward. > > > Mark > ______________________________**_________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/**index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss<http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss> > Archive: > https://groups.google.com/**group/skullspace-discuss-**archive/<https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/> > ______________________________**_________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/**index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss<http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss> > Archive: > https://groups.google.com/**group/skullspace-discuss-**archive/<https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/> >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
