Just hit reply and don't change the subject. :P
On 11 December 2012 07:23, Mark Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Justin wrote: > >> Mark, why do you always start a new thread? Respond to the already ongoing >> thread :P >> > > ayecee wrote: > > I myself like to see new threads when the topic changes. > > Technically I changed the subject line and stayed within the thread. > > Is this perhaps called a subthread? > > (It was pointed out that a good mail client would show this.) > > There was definitely a change in topic before I arrived -- some would say > that my changed subject line should have "was dx order" at the end of it to > mark the transition. And others would say that a new top level thread (that > I didn't start) was actually in order. (with or without the "was dx order" > suffix) > > I don't suppose RFC 1855 or something similar has definitive answers on > subthreads vs new threads and the "was" suffix convention. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/**rfc1855 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Etiquette_%28technology%29<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etiquette_%28technology%29> > > Open or solved issue? > > And who am I to speak of netiquette -- my post was pretty unnecessary -- I > was speaking for hypothetical others and not myself. I use credit cards and > I use PayPal. I have my concerns, but I don't see them as evil. There are > greater evils in the world to be concerned with. > > Drifting more off topic here (new thread bait): > With respect to the banking sector it actually drives me crazy when I hear > federal NDP MPs waste their energy complaining about banking fees and the > need for federal intervention in such a thing! Jeez, left-wing populism at > its worst: > http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/**2007/01/25/ndp-atm.html<http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2007/01/25/ndp-atm.html> > http://www.cba.ca/en/media-**room/65-news-releases/196-ndp-** > proposal-on-abm-fees-nothing-**more-than-political-rhetoric<http://www.cba.ca/en/media-room/65-news-releases/196-ndp-proposal-on-abm-fees-nothing-more-than-political-rhetoric> > > > Mark > > p.s. > > Andrew wrote: > >> Normally one would provide an address to receive bitcoins on when >> soliciting bitcoins. >> > > Except when said in jest in a post script, a form I'm sure I've now abused > horribly. > ______________________________**_________________ > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List > Help: > http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/**index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss<http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss> > Archive: > https://groups.google.com/**group/skullspace-discuss-**archive/<https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/> >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
