Sorry, I mean the subject line; don't change that. You can write about whatever you want!
On 11 December 2012 08:42, Justin Lacko <[email protected]> wrote: > Just hit reply and don't change the subject. :P > > > On 11 December 2012 07:23, Mark Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Justin wrote: >> >>> Mark, why do you always start a new thread? Respond to the already >>> ongoing >>> thread :P >>> >> >> ayecee wrote: >> > I myself like to see new threads when the topic changes. >> >> Technically I changed the subject line and stayed within the thread. >> >> Is this perhaps called a subthread? >> >> (It was pointed out that a good mail client would show this.) >> >> There was definitely a change in topic before I arrived -- some would say >> that my changed subject line should have "was dx order" at the end of it to >> mark the transition. And others would say that a new top level thread (that >> I didn't start) was actually in order. (with or without the "was dx order" >> suffix) >> >> I don't suppose RFC 1855 or something similar has definitive answers on >> subthreads vs new threads and the "was" suffix convention. >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/**rfc1855 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Etiquette_%28technology%29<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etiquette_%28technology%29> >> >> Open or solved issue? >> >> And who am I to speak of netiquette -- my post was pretty unnecessary -- >> I was speaking for hypothetical others and not myself. I use credit cards >> and I use PayPal. I have my concerns, but I don't see them as evil. There >> are greater evils in the world to be concerned with. >> >> Drifting more off topic here (new thread bait): >> With respect to the banking sector it actually drives me crazy when I >> hear federal NDP MPs waste their energy complaining about banking fees and >> the need for federal intervention in such a thing! Jeez, left-wing populism >> at its worst: >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/**2007/01/25/ndp-atm.html<http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2007/01/25/ndp-atm.html> >> http://www.cba.ca/en/media-**room/65-news-releases/196-ndp-** >> proposal-on-abm-fees-nothing-**more-than-political-rhetoric<http://www.cba.ca/en/media-room/65-news-releases/196-ndp-proposal-on-abm-fees-nothing-more-than-political-rhetoric> >> >> >> Mark >> >> p.s. >> >> Andrew wrote: >> >>> Normally one would provide an address to receive bitcoins on when >>> soliciting bitcoins. >>> >> >> Except when said in jest in a post script, a form I'm sure I've now >> abused horribly. >> ______________________________**_________________ >> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List >> Help: >> http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/**index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss<http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss> >> Archive: >> https://groups.google.com/**group/skullspace-discuss-**archive/<https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/> >> > >
_______________________________________________ SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
