Also, I really hate it when people quote USB 2.0 speeds as 480 Mbps, because 
you really only get upwards of 40 MB/s if you’re lucky (320 Mbps) and 30 MB/s 
usually (240 Mbps).
So make sure you don’t get confused by that.

Also also, keep in mind that a Firewire/USB-3.0 comparison is as stupid as 
USB-1.1/Firewire. Nowadays it’s USB 3.0 vs Thunderbolt that you’ve got to look 
at.

From: chris kluka 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:47 AM
To: Discuss, SkullSpace 
Subject: Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Recording talks [Was: Crazy idea..]

Also, don't forget that "firewire" also has a 2.0 version which is firewire 800 
that is somewhere between usb 2.0 and usb 3.0 in performance. 



On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:38 AM, d-_-b <[email protected]> wrote:

  On a desktop it would be ~25Volts, 6watts on a laptop it is determined by the 
battery. 



  On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Aemilianus Kehler <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sorry I should have stated that better, USB supplies 5v at .5 amps or 2.5 
watts total. Does FireWire use a higher voltage and amperage?

    Cheers!!

    On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:22 PM, d-_-b <[email protected]> wrote:


      Firewire shines when there is sustained data transfer over the line, as 
well as cases where devices need to be powered by the host/hub.   

      "Independent benchmark tests between USB 2.0 and IEEE-1394a show that 
IEEE-1394a is the performance winner, even though the published rates tell a 
different story. IEEE-1394a lends itself to  
      real-time video transfer due to higher sustained data rates. It is also 
very useful because of its peer-to-peer topology and ability to independently 
power CCD cameras from a host controller. 
      USB 2.0, meanwhile, has evolved into a convenient interconnect for 
external hard drives, flash drives, and consumer-grade digital cameras, owing to 
the availability of these ports on just 
      about every computer now sold. As previously mentioned, overall sustained 
data rates are reduced by the master-slave topology of USB 2.0 (due to overhead 
and increased CPU load). The inability 
      to provide substantial power is another downside, creating the need for 
an additional connection to the high performance camera." -- 
http://www.qimaging.com/support/pdfs/FirewireUSB.pdf

      On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Ace Tunes <[email protected]> wrote:

        Lol i was just about to say, that if they hadn't been firewire it would 
be a shame. 

        On Jan 30, 2013 4:09 PM, "Aemilianus Kehler" <[email protected]> wrote:

          FireWire, shudders, wasn't that just to beat out transfer rates of 
USB 1.0, which became obsolete with USB 2.0, and for sure is nothing compared 
to 3.0

          Cheers!!

          On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Mak Kolybabi <[email protected]> wrote:

          > On 2013-01-30 15:57, Benjamin Bergman wrote:
          >> I remember seeing a pile of firewire camcorders at SkSp 1.0 that 
had been
          >> used at least once at talks done at RRC. What happened to those?
          >
          > I believe they were trashed.
          >
          > --
          > Mak Kolybabi
          > <[email protected]>
          >
          > () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail
          > /\  www.asciiribbon.org  | Against proprietary extensions
          >
          > _______________________________________________
          > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
          > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
          > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
          _______________________________________________
          SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
          Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
          Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/


        _______________________________________________
        SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
        Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
        Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/





      -- 
      ) thor.robinson;
      ) icon/phreshlyspun/ppca/skullspace

      -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
      Version: 3.1
      GMU/O/AT d-s:+aC++++ULPL@E----W@N!oK?w---
      O-M--V?PS+++PEY+PGP+t5+XRtvb++DI++D++
      G+e*h--rx++
      ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

      _______________________________________________
      SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
      Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
      Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

    _______________________________________________
    SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
    Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
    Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/





  -- 
  ) thor.robinson;
  ) icon/phreshlyspun/ppca/skullspace

  -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
  Version: 3.1
  GMU/O/AT d-s:+aC++++ULPL@E----W@N!oK?w---
  O-M--V?PS+++PEY+PGP+t5+XRtvb++DI++D++
  G+e*h--rx++
  ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


  _______________________________________________
  SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
  Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
  Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to