Actually. My tablet has a usb style power adapter. But at 30v. It won't
charge on a normal one
On Jan 31, 2013 3:38 PM, "Aemilianus Kehler" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Those adapters still only run on 5v just like the USB specification but
> just at higher amperage not voltage, and that's total throughout amperage
> not exactly what the device is using. If they had an adapter with USB with
> a higher voltage good chance it would fry the device. So I'm still not
> getting how a spec such as FireWire could output higher than 12v when
> that's what it's main power supply provides? Besides the additional -12 v
> which has a weak sauce amperage value.
>
> Cheers!!
>
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 3:11 PM, "Michael Kozakewich" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Firewire is a specification, not an exact technology. It’s
> understandable that there could be leeway in the spec to  allow specific
> applications to use it in different ways. From what I’ve read, most
> implementations don’t go anywhere near the spec’s limits. Like 10-20 W
> power instead of something crazy like 60 W.
>
> It’s like, there are USB chargers for tablets and things that provide WAY
> more power than the ports on a laptop.
>
>  *From:* Aemilianus Kehler <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:32 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Recording talks [Was: Crazy idea..]
>
>  How is it possible that FireWire can have over 24 volts? Every PSU I've
> worked with only supplies 12v and have  a -12v lines so together you could
> get 24 volts.. Soo where is the extra voltage being supplied from? Does
> FireWire include some kind of transformer to boost voltage at the expense
> of amperage at the lower voltage?
>
> Cheers!!
>
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:25 AM, "Michael Kozakewich" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>    Also, I really hate it when people quote USB 2.0 speeds as 480 Mbps,
> because you really only get upwards of 40 MB/s if you’re lucky (320 Mbps)
> and 30 MB/s usually (240 Mbps).
>  So make sure you don’t get confused by that.
>
> Also also, keep in mind that a Firewire/USB-3.0 comparison is as stupid as
> USB-1.1/Firewire. Nowadays it’s USB 3.0 vs Thunderbolt that you’ve got to
> look at.
>
>  *From:* chris kluka <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:47 AM
> *To:* Discuss, SkullSpace <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [SkullSpace-Discuss] Recording talks [Was: Crazy idea..]
>
>  Also, don't forget that "firewire" also has a 2.0 version which is
> firewire 800 that is somewhere between usb 2.0 and usb 3.0 in performance.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:38 AM, d-_-b <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On a desktop it would be ~25Volts, 6watts on a laptop it is determined by
>> the battery.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Aemilianus Kehler <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Sorry I should have stated that better, USB supplies 5v at .5 amps or
>>> 2.5 watts total. Does FireWire use a higher voltage and amperage?
>>>
>>> Cheers!!
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:22 PM, d-_-b <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Firewire shines when there is sustained data transfer over the line,
>>> as well as cases where devices need to be powered by the host/hub.
>>>
>>> "Independent benchmark tests between USB 2.0 and IEEE-1394a show that
>>> IEEE-1394a is the performance winner, even though the published rates tell
>>> a different story. IEEE-1394a lends itself to
>>> real-time video transfer due to higher sustained data rates. It is also
>>> very useful because of its peer-to-peer topology and ability to
>>> independently power CCD cameras from a host controller.
>>> USB 2.0, meanwhile, has evolved into a convenient interconnect for
>>> external hard drives, flash drives, and consumer-grade digital cameras,
>>> owing to the availability of these ports on just
>>> about every computer now sold. As previously mentioned, overall
>>> sustained data rates are reduced by the master-slave topology of USB 2.0
>>> (due to overhead and increased CPU load). The inability
>>> to provide substantial power is another downside, creating the need for
>>> an additional connection to the high performance camera." --
>>> http://www.qimaging.com/support/pdfs/FirewireUSB.pdf
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Ace Tunes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lol i was just about to say, that if they hadn't been firewire it would
>>>> be a shame.
>>>>  On Jan 30, 2013 4:09 PM, "Aemilianus Kehler" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FireWire, shudders, wasn't that just to beat out transfer rates of USB
>>>>> 1.0, which became obsolete with USB 2.0, and for sure is nothing compared
>>>>> to 3.0
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Mak Kolybabi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > On 2013-01-30 15:57, Benjamin Bergman wrote:
>>>>> >> I remember seeing a pile of firewire camcorders at SkSp 1.0 that
>>>>> had been
>>>>> >> used at least once at talks done at RRC. What happened to those?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I believe they were trashed.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Mak Kolybabi
>>>>> > <[email protected]>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail
>>>>> > /\  www.asciiribbon.org  | Against proprietary extensions
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>> > Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>> > Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ) thor.robinson;
>>> ) icon/phreshlyspun/ppca/skullspace
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
>>> Version: 3.1
>>> GMU/O/AT d-s:+aC++++ULPL@E----W@N!oK?w---
>>> O-M--V?PS+++PEY+PGP+t5+XRtvb++DI++D++
>>> G+e*h--rx++
>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ) thor.robinson;
>> ) icon/phreshlyspun/ppca/skullspace
>>
>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
>> Version: 3.1
>> GMU/O/AT d-s:+aC++++ULPL@E----W@N!oK?w---
>> O-M--V?PS+++PEY+PGP+t5+XRtvb++DI++D++
>> G+e*h--rx++
>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
>> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
>> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
>  _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
>  ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
> Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
> Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/
>
_______________________________________________
SkullSpace Discuss Mailing List
Help: http://www.skullspace.ca/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List#Discuss
Archive: https://groups.google.com/group/skullspace-discuss-archive/

Reply via email to